Engineering Summary
Copper roughness is not a single number, and the "acceptable threshold" depends entirely on your operating frequency. At 1 GHz, standard ED copper (Rz ≈ 4 μm) is fine. At 28 GHz, HVLP (Rz < 1.5 μm) becomes mandatory. At 77 GHz and above, even first‑generation HVLP may be marginal – you need Rz < 0.6 μm.
Industry thresholds (production‑validated):
- < 3 GHz → ED / HTE (Rz > 4 μm)
- 3–10 GHz → RTF / VLP (Rz 2–3 μm)
- 10–28 GHz → VLP / HVLP (Rz 1.5–2 μm)
- 28–56 GHz → HVLP‑2 (Rz < 1.5 μm)
- 56–112 GHz → HVLP‑3 / HVLP‑4 (Rz < 1.0 μm)
- > 112 GHz → HVLP‑4 / HVLP‑5 (Rz < 0.5 μm)
Engineering note: The roughness specification in your PCB drawing must include which parameter is being measured (Rz vs Ra vs Rq vs Sa) and which side of the copper. A supplier claiming "low roughness copper" without specifying the parameter is not providing a verifiable specification.
1. What copper roughness actually means – and why the industry is confused
Copper roughness is the microscopic unevenness of the copper surface – the "peaks" and "valleys" that make a seemingly smooth sheet look like a mountain range under a microscope.
| Parameter | What it measures | Typical value range for ED copper | When to use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rz (average peak‑to‑valley) | Average distance between five highest peaks and five lowest valleys | 3–8 μm | Most common; should be your default spec |
| Ra (arithmetic mean deviation) | Average deviation from the mean line | 1.5–4 μm | Less representative for high‑frequency loss |
| Rq (root mean square) | RMS of deviations; sensitive to peaks | 2–5 μm | Better for statistical correlation |
| Sa (areal roughness, ISO 25178) | 3D areal measurement | 0.3–2 μm | Increasingly required for mmWave |
The rule: Always specify both the parameter and the side of the copper. If your supplier says "roughness < 2 μm" without specifying Rz/Ra/Sa, the statement has no engineering meaning.
| Copper type | Process | Rz range (μm) | Ra range (μm) | Primary application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED / STD | Electrodeposited, minimal treatment | > 5, up to 10 | 3–5 | Low‑frequency FR‑4, power, cost‑driven |
| HTE | Improved ED, better thermal stability | 4–7 | 2–4 | Automotive, multilayer inner layers |
| RTF | Reverse treated – rough side becomes bond side | 3–5 | 1.5–3 | 10–25 Gbps digital, cost‑effective upgrade |
| VLP | Controlled ED crystal growth | 1.5–3 | 0.8–1.5 | 25–56 Gbps, mid‑range RF |
| HVLP | Advanced deposition, organic additives | < 1.5 (1st gen) to < 0.3 (5th gen) | < 0.6 to < 0.15 | mmWave radar, 112G+, AI servers |
| RA (Rolled Annealed) | Physically rolled, most isotropic | < 1.5, down to 0.5 | < 0.8 | Flex circuits (FPC), highest‑end RF |
For high‑frequency PCB designs, HVLP is the baseline. Rogers PCB and high‑speed PCB applications increasingly require HVLP‑2 or higher.
2. The physics: why roughness kills high‑frequency signals
| Frequency | Skin depth (δ) | Roughness relative to δ (ED: Rz≈4 μm) | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 GHz | 2.1 μm | δ ≈ Rz (1:1) | Moderate loss increase begins |
| 2.4 GHz | 1.3 μm | δ < Rz | Loss becomes measurable |
| 5.8 GHz | 0.8 μm | δ ≈ 1/5 of Rz | Significant loss |
| 10 GHz | 0.6 μm | δ ≈ 1/7 of Rz | ED copper unacceptable |
| 28 GHz | 0.33 μm | δ ≈ 1/12 of Rz | ED copper destroys margin |
| 50 GHz | 0.24 μm | δ ≈ 1/17 of Rz | HVLP mandatory |
| 100 GHz+ | < 0.2 μm | δ < 1/20 of Rz | Sub‑micron roughness control required |
When copper roughness peaks exceed the skin depth (δ < Rz), the current path lengthens by 30–50% and AC resistance rises sharply, directly increasing insertion loss.
3. Measured data: how roughness translates into insertion loss
Measured insertion loss at 28 GHz (RO4350B, 50 Ω microstrip, 10 cm line length):
| Copper type | Rz (μm) | Loss (dB/cm) | Penalty vs HVLP‑2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ED | 4.0 | 0.092 | +0.041 dB/cm (+80%) |
| RTF | 2.5 | 0.071 | +0.020 dB/cm (+39%) |
| VLP | 1.8 | 0.061 | +0.010 dB/cm (+20%) |
| HVLP‑2 (Rz < 1.5) | 1.2 | 0.051 | reference |
At 50–100 GHz, microstrip is 8× more sensitive than stripline to reference plane roughness. For critical mmWave routing, stripline is strongly preferred.
4. Industry thresholds: when is copper roughness unacceptable?
Unambiguous "unacceptable" criteria:
| Situation | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| ED copper on 28 GHz+ RF layer | Unacceptable | Loss penalty > 0.04 dB/cm, destroys link margin |
| RTF copper on 77 GHz radar array | Unacceptable | Phase variation exceeds beamforming tolerance |
| Supplier cannot provide roughness data (Rz/Sa) for lot | Unacceptable | No verifiable specification → no quality control |
| VLP substituted for specified HVLP | Unacceptable | Material substitution changes loss budget |
| ENIG on mmWave line without ENEPIG option | Unacceptable | Nickel layer adds loss; gold variation affects phase |
For microwave PCB and RF PCB orders, always specify HVLP‑2 as minimum.
5. How to verify your PCB actually uses the specified copper
| Verification method | What it measures | Acceptance for HVLP |
|---|---|---|
| Profilometry (stylus) | Rz, Ra line scan | Rz < 1.5 μm |
| Optical profilometry | 3D Sa, Sz, Sq | Sa < 0.6 μm (best for mmWave) |
| SEM cross‑section | Visual profile, grain structure | Fine equiaxed grains, no large peaks |
| Δ‑Loss coupon (VNA) | Effective loss at target frequency | Loss matches HVLP reference database |
| Peel strength test | Adhesion to dielectric | ≥ 0.8 N/mm (IPC‑6012 Class 3) |
What to request in your stackup specification: "HVLP‑2 copper (Rz < 1.5 μm per ISO 4287) for all RF layers", "Δ‑Loss coupon included on every production panel", "Profilometry report per lot showing Rz and Sa values".
UltroNiu includes profilometry data for every mmWave production lot and builds Δ‑Loss coupons on every RF panel. You receive measured S‑parameters for your specific batch – not a generic certificate.
6. Process control and simulation requirements
HVLP copper requires significantly tighter process control: production speed ~50% slower than standard ED, organic additives, multi‑step surface treatment, and high‑precision equipment. If a supplier quotes an unusually short lead time for HVLP, they may be substituting standard copper. Verify roughness data before accepting delivery.
If your simulation does not include a copper roughness model, your loss prediction is optimistic – often by 0.1–0.2 dB/cm at 28 GHz. Recommended models:
- Huray model (snowball) – good for 28–56 GHz, requires measured Rz
- Groiss model – best above 50 GHz, requires 3D roughness (Sa, Sq), error < 3% at 50 GHz
7. Engineering summary: copper selection by frequency band
| Application | Frequency | Required copper type | Rz threshold (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| General FR‑4 digital | < 1 GHz | ED / HTE | > 4 |
| Automotive radar (short‑range) | 24 GHz | VLP / HVLP‑1 | < 2 |
| 5G mmWave | 28 GHz | HVLP‑1 / HVLP‑2 | < 1.5 |
| Satellite downlink | 30–40 GHz | HVLP‑2 / HVLP‑3 | < 1.2 |
| Automotive radar (long‑range) | 77 GHz | HVLP‑3 / HVLP‑4 | < 0.8 |
| 112G PAM4 backplane | 28 GHz Nyquist | HVLP‑2 / HVLP‑3 | < 1.2 |
| 224G PAM4 backplane | 56 GHz Nyquist | HVLP‑4 / HVLP‑5 | < 0.5 |
| Space / aerospace | All frequencies | RA or HVLP‑4 | < 0.8 |
For multilayer PCB and special PCB designs, ensure your stackup explicitly calls out the HVLP generation.
8. UltroNiu manufacturing capability for low‑roughness copper
| Parameter | UltroNiu production standard |
|---|---|
| HVLP Rz (typical) | 0.8–1.2 μm (2nd gen) / < 0.6 μm (3rd gen on request) – measured per lot |
| Compatible laminates | RO3003, RO4350B, Megtron 6/7, PTFE, Astra MT77, Tachyon |
| Peel strength | ≥ 0.8 N/mm (IPC‑6012 Class 3 qualified) |
| Profilometry | Every lot (optical profilometry, ISO 25178 Sa/Rz reporting) |
| Δ‑Loss coupon | Standard on every mmWave / high‑speed panel |
| Surface finish for mmWave | ENEPIG recommended; ENIG available with roughness control |
| Roughness modelling support | Groiss model parameter extraction from measured profilometry data |
UltroNiu does not substitute VLP or RTF when HVLP is specified. If the material lot does not meet the specified Rz threshold, we reject the lot – no exceptions.
9. Final engineering judgement
Copper roughness is not a "nice to have" parameter at mmWave and high‑speed frequencies – it is a physical limit that determines whether your design works or fails.
- Below 3 GHz, any copper works.
- 3–10 GHz, RTF and VLP become cost‑effective upgrades.
- 10–28 GHz, VLP is minimum acceptable for serious design.
- 28–56 GHz, HVLP‑2 (Rz < 1.5 μm) is mandatory.
- 56–112 GHz, HVLP‑3 / HVLP‑4 (Rz < 0.8 μm) are required; use Groiss model.
- Above 112 GHz, only highest‑generation ultra‑smooth copper (Rz < 0.5 μm) works.
⚠️ If your PCB supplier says "we use low‑roughness copper" but cannot provide Rz, Sa, or profilometry data for your specific lot, they are not qualified for your mmWave or high‑speed project.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What Rz value is considered "unacceptable" for 28GHz?
Rz > 1.5 μm is unacceptable for 28GHz. ED copper (Rz ≈ 4 μm) adds ~0.04 dB/cm extra loss compared to HVLP‑2.
Q2: Why can't I just use ED copper and add more amplifier gain?
Amplifiers add noise and consume power. Roughness loss occurs before the amplifier – it cannot be recovered. A 4 dB loss penalty requires 4 dB more gain, which increases noise figure by ≈4 dB.
Q3: How do I specify copper roughness on a fabrication drawing?
Write: "HVLP‑2 copper (Rz < 1.5 µm per ISO 4287) for all RF layers. Profilometry report per lot. Δ‑Loss coupon on every panel."
Q4: What is the difference between HVLP‑2 and HVLP‑4?
HVLP‑2 has Rz < 1.5 μm, suitable for 28GHz and 112G. HVLP‑4 has Rz < 0.5 μm, required for 224G and advanced mmWave (77GHz+).
Q5: Does UltroNiu provide profilometry reports for production lots?
Yes. Every mmWave lot includes optical profilometry (ISO 25178) reporting Sa and Rz values, plus Δ‑Loss coupon S2P files.
Related Engineering Resources
References: IPC‑TM‑650‑2.5.5.13 (Δ‑Loss), ISO 25178 (areal profilometry), ISO 4287 (Rz/Ra), Rogers RO4350B datasheet, industry Huray/Groiss roughness models.
Tags:
Related Articles
Related Products
8-Layer RO4350B Controlled-Impedance RF PCB — Open-Window Impedance (RF Systems, Industrial Automation)
• Material: Rogers RO4350B • Layers: 8L • Key Tech: Open-Window Impedance
20-Layer High-Frequency PCB — Shengyi S7136H (RO4350B Alternative) Yin-Yang Copper · Multi-Group Impedance · Controlled Depth Slot
• Material: Shengyi S7136H • Layers: 20L • Key Tech: Yin-Yang Copper · Multi-Group Impedance · Controlled Depth Slot
6-Layer RO4350B Controlled-Impedance RF PCB — Wideband RF Routing (5G RF Front-End, Filters)
• Material: RO4350B • Layers: 6L • Impedance: ±10%
Related Products/Solutions
Quick links


